May 19, 2012
Tea with five sugars, 2008 (from the series, Joseph of Hoxton)
Martin Usborne
“I first met Joe in 2007 on a hot Sunday morning in Hoxton square, right outside my studio.  
I was lying in the sun trying to look cool amongst the fashionable twenty-somethings when I saw an elderly man talking to people at random. He wore an old brown suit, thick glasses and held a plastic bag stiffly at his side. He looked so out of place amidst the neon youth that I wanted to photograph him immediately.My intentions were selfish. I thought he was amusing. I thought he might be drunk. Homeless perhaps. What a great subject! I asked if I could take his picture. He said yes and chatted at me, I didn’t listen …where is the light I thought, what would be a good background?
I soon found out that Joe was not a drunk. And nor was he homeless. In fact THIS was his home. Hoxton. Unlike nearly everyone else in the square, he had lived in and around the neigbourhood all his life - for 81 and half years to be precise. If anyone belonged here, he did.
Over the following months I photographed Joe many times in and around the area as well as in the studio. We became good friends. My intention was to make a worthy project: to hear the views of a neglected minority and to chart the history of the area in both words and pictures.  How dull. Luckily, Joe failed to indulge me.  What he actually wanted to talk about was old movies, mixed marriages and Johnny Depp… and occasionally what Hoxton was like many, many years ago.
So what has Joe taught me? That the Germans used to make the best films, that his sinuses are very bad indeed and that I am wonderfully wrong about many things.…oh, and that he is quite possibly one of the sweetest people I have ever met. Thanks Joe”

Tea with five sugars, 2008 (from the series, Joseph of Hoxton)

Martin Usborne

“I first met Joe in 2007 on a hot Sunday morning in Hoxton square, right outside my studio.  

I was lying in the sun trying to look cool amongst the fashionable twenty-somethings when I saw an elderly man talking to people at random. He wore an old brown suit, thick glasses and held a plastic bag stiffly at his side. He looked so out of place amidst the neon youth that I wanted to photograph him immediately.

My intentions were selfish. I thought he was amusing. I thought he might be drunk. Homeless perhaps. What a great subject! I asked if I could take his picture. He said yes and chatted at me, I didn’t listen …where is the light I thought, what would be a good background?

I soon found out that Joe was not a drunk. And nor was he homeless. In fact THIS was his home. Hoxton. Unlike nearly everyone else in the square, he had lived in and around the neigbourhood all his life - for 81 and half years to be precise. If anyone belonged here, he did.

Over the following months I photographed Joe many times in and around the area as well as in the studio. We became good friends. My intention was to make a worthy project: to hear the views of a neglected minority and to chart the history of the area in both words and pictures.  How dull. Luckily, Joe failed to indulge me.  What he actually wanted to talk about was old movies, mixed marriages and Johnny Depp… and occasionally what Hoxton was like many, many years ago.

So what has Joe taught me? 

That the Germans used to make the best films, that his sinuses are very bad indeed and that I am wonderfully wrong about many things.

…oh, and that he is quite possibly one of the sweetest 
people I have ever met. Thanks Joe”

March 3, 2012
Lucian Shaving, 2006 (David Dawson)
From The Life of Lucien Freud.

Lucian Shaving, 2006 (David Dawson)

From The Life of Lucien Freud.

From the series, The E.U. Eastern Fence.
Dana Popa
“January 2007, Romania joins European Union. 
Five hundred years old village of Ruginesti lies isolated within the hills of the Romanian Carpathians. One hundred and eleven families spin a frozen in time lifestyle, the same way their great-great grandfathers did. Only the elderly and young children remained. Every single household has a relative working abroad. 
Towards east, the EU family runs its frontier with The Republic of Moldova (an ex Soviet country) through the middle of another village. Both Romania and USSR who had taken Moldova in 1945, sealed this frontier. For 45 years almost nobody crossed it. There are families who had relatives in the same village, but on the other side of the border and they never saw each other again. In 1990, after the first free elections in The Soviet Socialist Republic of Moldova, tens of thousands of Romanians and Moldavians gathered at the border village to celebrate what they thought will follow, the reunification. The scenes on the bridge were reminding of the fall of the Berlin wall. Since then Romanians looked west, Moldavians chose to stay under the east wing, even more since the Communists ruled the country. Romanians are now confident at the table of the European Union. Moldavians are left behind the fence. ”

From the series, The E.U. Eastern Fence.

Dana Popa

“January 2007, Romania joins European Union. 

Five hundred years old village of Ruginesti lies isolated within the hills of the Romanian Carpathians. One hundred and eleven families spin a frozen in time lifestyle, the same way their great-great grandfathers did. Only the elderly and young children remained. Every single household has a relative working abroad. 

Towards east, the EU family runs its frontier with The Republic of Moldova (an ex Soviet country) through the middle of another village. 

Both Romania and USSR who had taken Moldova in 1945, sealed this frontier. For 45 years almost nobody crossed it. There are families who had relatives in the same village, but on the other side of the border and they never saw each other again. 

In 1990, after the first free elections in The Soviet Socialist Republic of Moldova, tens of thousands of Romanians and Moldavians gathered at the border village to celebrate what they thought will follow, the reunification. The scenes on the bridge were reminding of the fall of the Berlin wall. Since then Romanians looked west, Moldavians chose to stay under the east wing, even more since the Communists ruled the country. Romanians are now confident at the table of the European Union. Moldavians are left behind the fence. ”

From the series, Europeans. Untouched By Communism.
Dana Popa
“Twenty years on after the Romanian ‘revolution’ in December 1989, the heavy grey blocks of flats - the painful communist legacy – are the only apparent element to remain unchanged. 
I met with Romanian youth to see what their lives are like nowadays. Connected to the world via internet, with access to the latest news and freedom to travel anywhere in Europe, with possibilities of driving convertible cars in their 20s and study abroad, they can’t imagine a reality that was the long cues for milk and a small portion of meat or petrol for hours to an end in the middle of the night, the small bread ratio one family was entitled to, people disappearing for ever with no trace, the no right to listen to any foreign radio channel or to travel abroad, the everyday censorship, etc. They live in a reality that inevitably carries on much from the communist past, moulds onto the bittersweet changes that followed, still, is more and more anchored in the imported Western European culture. Romanian girls would now wear the latest Italian fashion, boys would have the last gadgets appearing on the western market. They all freely apply to the Western Universities’ courses and often party in Ibiza. ”
———
“Born in Romania in 1977, Dana Popa is just old enough to remember life under communism. She still has her family bread ration card, hand-written ticks indicating each half-loaf quota per person. She laughs at a hand-tinted photograph of herself as a Young Pioneer, and at memories of the mass spectacles she participated in as a member of the organisation. She also remembers the network of personal contacts that had to be tapped to get salami, and the suspicion that surrounded anyone allowed to travel abroad.
Like many people of her generation, Popa left Romania almost as soon as she could, moving to London in 2001 and going on to study photojournalism at the London College of Communication. But she remains fascinated with her homeland, returning for this project, a study of young Romanians born just before or after the fall of communism. Dressed in fashionable Western clothes and laughing with friends in the street, or hanging out at home playing computer games and putting on make-up, these contemporary Romanian adolescents apparently differ little from their European and North American counterparts. One image shows a young woman who has had breast implants, an increasingly popular procedure in Romania.
Popa is stunned by their opportunities, both material and cultural, and her images have a gentle slightly wistful atmosphere, as if mourning what could have been if she’d been born a little later. But she’s also mistrustful of her subjects’ apparent Westernisation. Although they may look European, their day-to-day existence is still shaped by Eastern Bloc architecture and attitudes, she says, adding “they have no direct memory of communism but they live in a reality that inevitably carries much from the past”.
Her reading is visible in some of her images, in the ageing apartment blocks, “Peoples’ Parks” and factories that form the backdrops to her subjects’ lives. More intimate photographs show the traces of communism that still persist in Romanian culture and people. One portrait shows a mother dying her young daughter’s hair at home, for example, the girl’s head neatly wrapped up in a plastic bag – hair dye and plastic bags were both hard to get hold of in communist Romania, and people got used to improvising. “It becomes clear that the instant translation‚ into another culture, into another way of life and value – and that is what people in Eastern Europe expect to happen – is impossible,” wrote Slavenka Draculic in 1991 in The Trivial is Political, the introduction to How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed. “The ‘iron curtains’ will stay with us for a long time: in our memories, in our lives that we cannot renounce, no matter how difficult they were and how hard we try.”
Popa’s images also show that contemporary Romanian identity isn’t just a matter of before or after communism, though. The heavily patterned carpets and rugs in some shots speak of Romania’s Eastern and Ottoman heritage; Orthodox icons reference the schism that divided Europe into East and West more than 1000 years ago. For all their apparent Westernisation young Romanians draw on a long history peculiar to their country, she implies, just as the young Americans and Britons they seek to emulate. In fact Romanian culture is a complex mix of peoples and tribes – the name Romania derives from the Latin for “citizen of Rome” and the region was part of the Roman Empire until the 3rdcentury. It was then inhabited and ruled by Germanic tribes, Goths, Huns, Slavs, Saxons, Ottomans and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and wasn’t recognised as an independent state until 1878. Its borders continued to shift until just after the Second World War, when the country reached its current status quo.
Despite this, though, Romanian national identity has existed for at least 500 years – something that was to prove both a blessing and a curse under communism. Soviet troops helped establish the People’s Republic in 1947, but when President Nicolae Ceausescu took power in 1965 his epic national pride gave the country a certain degree of autonomy. Unwilling to toe the Soviet line, Ceausescu ended Romania’s active participation in the Warsaw Pact; he openly condemned the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and resisted Gorbachev-style economic reform in the 1980s.
Ceausescu’s nationalism also brought folly, though, folly that led to misery and poverty for millions. In 1966 he attempted to increase the country’s population to 25 million by banning abortion; women were pushed into backstreet alternatives that became a common cause of death. In 1982 he decided to repay Romania’s foreign debts by banning imports and exporting the nation’s produce; “luxury” items disappeared from the shops and staples such as bread, milk, vegetables and electricity became hard to find. Both policies helped create the orphanages that became infamous in the 1980s, and which still cause controversy now – Romanian children have been political bargaining chips for nearly half a century, so it’s apt that Popa references them again.
Romanian national identity proved Ceausescu’s undoing when violent protests sprang up in Western Romania at the end of 1989. By 18 December a group of protestors was singing nationalist songs while waving a flag with a hole in its centre – a Romanian flag with the communist insignia cut out. This flag became increasingly frequent as the protests turned to revolution and by Christmas Day, Ceausescu and his wife had been executed. Slavoj Zizek has interpreted the hole as signifying the absence of power once the government had been kicked out (in Tarrying with the Negative, 1993); the red, yellow and blue and the gaping hole suggest other readings too, though, such as the ghostly endurance of communism and the continuing strength of Romanian cultural identity.
“Men and women are not only themselves; they are also the region in which they were born, the city apartment or the farm in which they learnt to walk, the games they played as children, the old wives’ tales they overheard, the food they ate, the schools they attended, the sports they followed, the poets they read, and the God they believed in,” wrote W Somerset Maugham in The Razor’s Edge, a quote Popa asked me to think about. “It is all these things that have made them what they are.”
Like Popa, many young Romanians now feel they have to emigrate to progress. Most of her subjects in this project hope to move abroad, and it’s estimated that two million, a tenth of the population, have done so since 1989. Holding onto its youngest, brightest sparks is now one of Romania’s biggest challenges, and it’s a challenge Popa obliquely refers to in her shots of empty parks, abandoned factories and unpeopled streets. Perhaps the hole in the Romanian flag can also be interpreted as a symbol of this absence; perhaps Popa’s project is as much an elegy to the country she left behind as a register of what she missed growing up there.” (from Photomonitor)

From the series, Europeans. Untouched By Communism.

Dana Popa

“Twenty years on after the Romanian ‘revolution’ in December 1989, the heavy grey blocks of flats - the painful communist legacy – are the only apparent element to remain unchanged. 

I met with Romanian youth to see what their lives are like nowadays. 

Connected to the world via internet, with access to the latest news and freedom to travel anywhere in Europe, with possibilities of driving convertible cars in their 20s and study abroad, they can’t imagine a reality that was the long cues for milk and a small portion of meat or petrol for hours to an end in the middle of the night, the small bread ratio one family was entitled to, people disappearing for ever with no trace, the no right to listen to any foreign radio channel or to travel abroad, the everyday censorship, etc. 

They live in a reality that inevitably carries on much from the communist past, moulds onto the bittersweet changes that followed, still, is more and more anchored in the imported Western European culture. Romanian girls would now wear the latest Italian fashion, boys would have the last gadgets appearing on the western market. They all freely apply to the Western Universities’ courses and often party in Ibiza. ”

———

“Born in Romania in 1977, Dana Popa is just old enough to remember life under communism. She still has her family bread ration card, hand-written ticks indicating each half-loaf quota per person. She laughs at a hand-tinted photograph of herself as a Young Pioneer, and at memories of the mass spectacles she participated in as a member of the organisation. She also remembers the network of personal contacts that had to be tapped to get salami, and the suspicion that surrounded anyone allowed to travel abroad.

Like many people of her generation, Popa left Romania almost as soon as she could, moving to London in 2001 and going on to study photojournalism at the London College of Communication. But she remains fascinated with her homeland, returning for this project, a study of young Romanians born just before or after the fall of communism. Dressed in fashionable Western clothes and laughing with friends in the street, or hanging out at home playing computer games and putting on make-up, these contemporary Romanian adolescents apparently differ little from their European and North American counterparts. One image shows a young woman who has had breast implants, an increasingly popular procedure in Romania.

Popa is stunned by their opportunities, both material and cultural, and her images have a gentle slightly wistful atmosphere, as if mourning what could have been if she’d been born a little later. But she’s also mistrustful of her subjects’ apparent Westernisation. Although they may look European, their day-to-day existence is still shaped by Eastern Bloc architecture and attitudes, she says, adding “they have no direct memory of communism but they live in a reality that inevitably carries much from the past”.

Her reading is visible in some of her images, in the ageing apartment blocks, “Peoples’ Parks” and factories that form the backdrops to her subjects’ lives. More intimate photographs show the traces of communism that still persist in Romanian culture and people. One portrait shows a mother dying her young daughter’s hair at home, for example, the girl’s head neatly wrapped up in a plastic bag – hair dye and plastic bags were both hard to get hold of in communist Romania, and people got used to improvising. “It becomes clear that the instant translation‚ into another culture, into another way of life and value – and that is what people in Eastern Europe expect to happen – is impossible,” wrote Slavenka Draculic in 1991 in The Trivial is Political, the introduction to How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed. “The ‘iron curtains’ will stay with us for a long time: in our memories, in our lives that we cannot renounce, no matter how difficult they were and how hard we try.”

Popa’s images also show that contemporary Romanian identity isn’t just a matter of before or after communism, though. The heavily patterned carpets and rugs in some shots speak of Romania’s Eastern and Ottoman heritage; Orthodox icons reference the schism that divided Europe into East and West more than 1000 years ago. For all their apparent Westernisation young Romanians draw on a long history peculiar to their country, she implies, just as the young Americans and Britons they seek to emulate. In fact Romanian culture is a complex mix of peoples and tribes – the name Romania derives from the Latin for “citizen of Rome” and the region was part of the Roman Empire until the 3rdcentury. It was then inhabited and ruled by Germanic tribes, Goths, Huns, Slavs, Saxons, Ottomans and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and wasn’t recognised as an independent state until 1878. Its borders continued to shift until just after the Second World War, when the country reached its current status quo.

Despite this, though, Romanian national identity has existed for at least 500 years – something that was to prove both a blessing and a curse under communism. Soviet troops helped establish the People’s Republic in 1947, but when President Nicolae Ceausescu took power in 1965 his epic national pride gave the country a certain degree of autonomy. Unwilling to toe the Soviet line, Ceausescu ended Romania’s active participation in the Warsaw Pact; he openly condemned the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and resisted Gorbachev-style economic reform in the 1980s.

Ceausescu’s nationalism also brought folly, though, folly that led to misery and poverty for millions. In 1966 he attempted to increase the country’s population to 25 million by banning abortion; women were pushed into backstreet alternatives that became a common cause of death. In 1982 he decided to repay Romania’s foreign debts by banning imports and exporting the nation’s produce; “luxury” items disappeared from the shops and staples such as bread, milk, vegetables and electricity became hard to find. Both policies helped create the orphanages that became infamous in the 1980s, and which still cause controversy now – Romanian children have been political bargaining chips for nearly half a century, so it’s apt that Popa references them again.

Romanian national identity proved Ceausescu’s undoing when violent protests sprang up in Western Romania at the end of 1989. By 18 December a group of protestors was singing nationalist songs while waving a flag with a hole in its centre – a Romanian flag with the communist insignia cut out. This flag became increasingly frequent as the protests turned to revolution and by Christmas Day, Ceausescu and his wife had been executed. Slavoj Zizek has interpreted the hole as signifying the absence of power once the government had been kicked out (in Tarrying with the Negative, 1993); the red, yellow and blue and the gaping hole suggest other readings too, though, such as the ghostly endurance of communism and the continuing strength of Romanian cultural identity.

“Men and women are not only themselves; they are also the region in which they were born, the city apartment or the farm in which they learnt to walk, the games they played as children, the old wives’ tales they overheard, the food they ate, the schools they attended, the sports they followed, the poets they read, and the God they believed in,” wrote W Somerset Maugham in The Razor’s Edge, a quote Popa asked me to think about. “It is all these things that have made them what they are.”

Like Popa, many young Romanians now feel they have to emigrate to progress. Most of her subjects in this project hope to move abroad, and it’s estimated that two million, a tenth of the population, have done so since 1989. Holding onto its youngest, brightest sparks is now one of Romania’s biggest challenges, and it’s a challenge Popa obliquely refers to in her shots of empty parks, abandoned factories and unpeopled streets. Perhaps the hole in the Romanian flag can also be interpreted as a symbol of this absence; perhaps Popa’s project is as much an elegy to the country she left behind as a register of what she missed growing up there.” (from Photomonitor)

February 8, 2012
 The light from a mobile phone illuminated two Palestinian children as they played games on the device at their family’s home during an electrical power outage at the Jabaliya refugee camp in Gaza Strip Tuesday. (Ali Ali/European Pressphoto Agency)

 The light from a mobile phone illuminated two Palestinian children as they played games on the device at their family’s home during an electrical power outage at the Jabaliya refugee camp in Gaza Strip Tuesday. (Ali Ali/European Pressphoto Agency)

January 28, 2012

Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan (from the series, Under A Nuclear Cloud)
Ed Ou

Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan (from the series, Under A Nuclear Cloud)

Ed Ou

January 27, 2012
January 17, 2012. President Barack Obama unexpectedly runs into Michelle on her birthday in the basement of the White House (Christopher Morris—VII for TIME) (from Inside Barack Obama’s World)

January 17, 2012. President Barack Obama unexpectedly runs into Michelle on her birthday in the basement of the White House (Christopher Morris—VII for TIME) (from Inside Barack Obama’s World)

January 7, 2012
A girl who shares a bath and flat with three other girls, London, 1961.
Eve Arnold

A girl who shares a bath and flat with three other girls, London, 1961.

Eve Arnold

January 2, 2012
From the series, Smoking Kids.
Frieke Janssens
“A YouTube video of a chainsmoking Indonesian toddler inspired me to create this series, “Smoking Kids”. The video highlighted the cultural differences between the east and west, and questioned notions of smoking being a mainly adult activity. Adult smokers are the societal norm, so I wanted to isolate the viewer’s focus upon the issue of smoking itself. I felt that children smoking would have a surreal impact upon the viewer and compel them to truly see the acts of smoking rather than making assumptions about the person doing the act. Coincidentally around the time of the “Smoking Kids” gallery opening, a law was passed, and smoking has been banned from Belgian bars. There was an outcry from the public about government intervention, feelings that freedom was being oppressed, and that adults were being treated like children. With health reasons driving many cities to ban smoking, the culture around smoking has a retro feel, like the time period of “Mad Men,” when smoking on a plane or in a restaurant was not unusual. The aesthetics of smoke and the particular way smokers gesticulate with their hands and posture cannot be denied, but among the different tribes of “Smoking Kids,” - Glamour, Jazz, and The Marginal - there is a nod to less attractive aspects, on the line between the beauty and ugliness of smoking. To assure you of the safety of the children, there were no real cigarettes on set. Instead, chalk and sticks of cheese were the prop stand ins, while candles and incense provided the wisps of smoke.”

From the series, Smoking Kids.

Frieke Janssens

“A YouTube video of a chainsmoking Indonesian toddler inspired me to create this series, “Smoking Kids”. The video highlighted the cultural differences between the east and west, and questioned notions of smoking being a mainly adult activity. Adult smokers are the societal norm, so I wanted to isolate the viewer’s focus upon the issue of smoking itself. I felt that children smoking would have a surreal impact upon the viewer and compel them to truly see the acts of smoking rather than making assumptions about the person doing the act. Coincidentally around the time of the “Smoking Kids” gallery opening, a law was passed, and smoking has been banned from Belgian bars. There was an outcry from the public about government intervention, feelings that freedom was being oppressed, and that adults were being treated like children. With health reasons driving many cities to ban smoking, the culture around smoking has a retro feel, like the time period of “Mad Men,” when smoking on a plane or in a restaurant was not unusual. The aesthetics of smoke and the particular way smokers gesticulate with their hands and posture cannot be denied, but among the different tribes of “Smoking Kids,” - Glamour, Jazz, and The Marginal - there is a nod to less attractive aspects, on the line between the beauty and ugliness of smoking. To assure you of the safety of the children, there were no real cigarettes on set. Instead, chalk and sticks of cheese were the prop stand ins, while candles and incense provided the wisps of smoke.”

December 18, 2011
Safak shows her little sister Ashti how to hold a Kalashniknov.  This is the first time the sister have met as Ashti was born five years after Safak joined the PKK.  Ashti arrived at the camp two days before her mother, who hadn’t seen Safak since she enlisted at the age of 13 (from the series, No Friend But the Mountains).
Anastasia Taylor-Lind
“In the 1980s, among the ranks of the guerrilla fighters of the PKK or Kurdistan Workers Party, there were reported to be a dozen women fighting.  While figures are inexact, one commander told us as many as 10,000 PKK soldiers are amassing in mountain camps just across the Iraqi border, risking their lives in daily spats with the Turkish army - the military representatives of a government they accuse of unmerciful human rights atrocities and the suppression of a nation of 14 million people.  However, what is not widely reported is that a third of these Kurdish combatants are women - a phenomenon perhaps without precedent.
In all recent conflicts, from Bosnia to Palestine, women have been amongst those killed fighting, but has there ever been such a exoduc of women leaving village life and their families, to take up arms in a foreign land?
Each had a story about the family they had left behind, and although they come from diverse backgrounds, and often from different countries, each had an experience that has driven their decision to fight and was at the heart of their belief in the PKK cause.  And each believed that the sacrifices they had made, in leaving their homes and committing to a life which precludes marriage and having children, was worthwhile.” (Text by Katie Scott)

Safak shows her little sister Ashti how to hold a Kalashniknov.  This is the first time the sister have met as Ashti was born five years after Safak joined the PKK.  Ashti arrived at the camp two days before her mother, who hadn’t seen Safak since she enlisted at the age of 13 (from the series, No Friend But the Mountains).

Anastasia Taylor-Lind

“In the 1980s, among the ranks of the guerrilla fighters of the PKK or Kurdistan Workers Party, there were reported to be a dozen women fighting.  While figures are inexact, one commander told us as many as 10,000 PKK soldiers are amassing in mountain camps just across the Iraqi border, risking their lives in daily spats with the Turkish army - the military representatives of a government they accuse of unmerciful human rights atrocities and the suppression of a nation of 14 million people.  However, what is not widely reported is that a third of these Kurdish combatants are women - a phenomenon perhaps without precedent.

In all recent conflicts, from Bosnia to Palestine, women have been amongst those killed fighting, but has there ever been such a exoduc of women leaving village life and their families, to take up arms in a foreign land?

Each had a story about the family they had left behind, and although they come from diverse backgrounds, and often from different countries, each had an experience that has driven their decision to fight and was at the heart of their belief in the PKK cause.  And each believed that the sacrifices they had made, in leaving their homes and committing to a life which precludes marriage and having children, was worthwhile.” (Text by Katie Scott)

December 16, 2011
Ken Schles’ fourth monograph Oculus considers the nature of images in  various guises: Images in memory and the use of the image as a construct  to define our personhood or to define our world, as well as the image  on the printed page. Oculus looks at the image as it functions  as a metaphor in all its forms. But the investigations we see here are  not idle or abstract. The root of this exploration, what gave birth to  and sustained these inquiries, was a deeply personal (and somewhat  troubling) set of circumstances. Inspired by the opening lines of  Nabokov’s autobiography, Sleep Memory (”The cradle rocks above  an abyss, but common sense tells us that our existence is but a brief  crack of light between two eternities of darkness.”), Schles made these  images of sleeping children and compared them to a kind of somnambulism  he was experiencing. He explains, “…the world, as I once knew it, had  unraveled. I still acted as if things were as they had been. I was the  sleepwalker moving through the bedrooms of these still and silent  children, all tucked in their beds. Eventually, I came to realize that  seeing is, in many ways, only ‘believing.’”

Ken Schles’ fourth monograph Oculus considers the nature of images in various guises: Images in memory and the use of the image as a construct to define our personhood or to define our world, as well as the image on the printed page. Oculus looks at the image as it functions as a metaphor in all its forms. But the investigations we see here are not idle or abstract. The root of this exploration, what gave birth to and sustained these inquiries, was a deeply personal (and somewhat troubling) set of circumstances. Inspired by the opening lines of Nabokov’s autobiography, Sleep Memory (”The cradle rocks above an abyss, but common sense tells us that our existence is but a brief crack of light between two eternities of darkness.”), Schles made these images of sleeping children and compared them to a kind of somnambulism he was experiencing. He explains, “…the world, as I once knew it, had unraveled. I still acted as if things were as they had been. I was the sleepwalker moving through the bedrooms of these still and silent children, all tucked in their beds. Eventually, I came to realize that seeing is, in many ways, only ‘believing.’”

November 3, 2011
Two residents play Chinese chess at an old residential community in  central Beijing, November 3, 2011. China’s housing ministry said on  October 27 that it may expand plans to build state-subsidised homes in  2012 (REUTERS/Jason Lee).

Two residents play Chinese chess at an old residential community in central Beijing, November 3, 2011. China’s housing ministry said on October 27 that it may expand plans to build state-subsidised homes in 2012 (REUTERS/Jason Lee).

August 12, 2011
Reed the Rooster
Anna Moller

Reed the Rooster

Anna Moller

August 10, 2011
Doug Dubois

Doug Dubois

July 11, 2011
From the series, Private Views.
Barbara Crane
“These one-of-a-kind photographs were made primarily in Chicago at  various large public festivals from 1980 through 1984. I have treasured  these pictures for their depiction of universal experiences, yet they  are also a record of a specific moment in time as communicated via the  unique—and now, sadly obsolete—photographic medium of the Polaroid.  These images were shot during the heat of summer days, very close to the  subjects, as I struggled to carry a hand-held 4 by 5 Super Graphic 45  camera, boxes of Polaroid sheet film, and a Polaroid film back. These  pictures are truly labors of love.” —Barbara Crane.
“In the early 1980s, photographer Barbara Crane embarked on a  photographic project shot during Chicago’s various summer festivals.  Armed with a Super Speed Graphic camera and Polaroid film, Crane waded  in close to the revelers and focused on capturing the details of  clothing and hairstyles, but most important, gesture. The images are  tightly cropped and terrifically alive, viscerally bringing us into the  crush of people eating, drinking, and enjoying the crowd dynamic—an  incredible inventory of private gestures performed in public spaces.  Private Views offers an intense, sun-drenched, sweat-glistening  photographic experience. The effect is mesmerizing and intensely  compelling, creating a palpable sensuality from image to image—an  incredible document, not of a particular event or personalities, but of  something less tangible: the public expression of euphoria. ” - Aperture

From the series, Private Views.

Barbara Crane

“These one-of-a-kind photographs were made primarily in Chicago at various large public festivals from 1980 through 1984. I have treasured these pictures for their depiction of universal experiences, yet they are also a record of a specific moment in time as communicated via the unique—and now, sadly obsolete—photographic medium of the Polaroid. These images were shot during the heat of summer days, very close to the subjects, as I struggled to carry a hand-held 4 by 5 Super Graphic 45 camera, boxes of Polaroid sheet film, and a Polaroid film back. These pictures are truly labors of love.” —Barbara Crane.

“In the early 1980s, photographer Barbara Crane embarked on a photographic project shot during Chicago’s various summer festivals. Armed with a Super Speed Graphic camera and Polaroid film, Crane waded in close to the revelers and focused on capturing the details of clothing and hairstyles, but most important, gesture. The images are tightly cropped and terrifically alive, viscerally bringing us into the crush of people eating, drinking, and enjoying the crowd dynamic—an incredible inventory of private gestures performed in public spaces. Private Views offers an intense, sun-drenched, sweat-glistening photographic experience. The effect is mesmerizing and intensely compelling, creating a palpable sensuality from image to image—an incredible document, not of a particular event or personalities, but of something less tangible: the public expression of euphoria. ” - Aperture